Florida Property Tax Reform · City Spotlight

Mount Dora

A citizen-focused look at the City’s FY2025–26 General Fund, the services it supports, and how property taxes fit into the larger revenue picture.

At a glance

Understanding the City's Main Operating Budget

The General Fund is the City's main operating budget. The figures below show recurring General Fund revenue, the FY2026 adopted spending plan, property-tax revenue, and the share of recurring General Fund revenue provided by property taxes.

General Fund Revenue
$34.1M
Recurring operating revenue before fund balance and other financing sources.
General Fund Spending Plan
$36.0M
FY2026 adopted General Fund spending plan.
Property Tax Revenue
$13.0M
Current ad valorem revenue budgeted in the General Fund.
Property Tax Share
38.1%
Property-tax revenue as a share of recurring General Fund revenue.
How to read these figures: Mount Dora expects $34,082,515 in recurring General Fund revenue and has adopted $35,997,048 in General Fund spending for FY2026. The $1,914,533 difference reflects authorized carryforward items, prior-year encumbrances, and approved project funding. These are resources carried into the new fiscal year for previously approved purposes; the difference does not, by itself, indicate waste or an operating deficit.
Where the money goes

Major General Fund department spending

The source page reports rounded department figures and percentages. The displayed rounded amounts total about $34.03 million, below the exact $35.997 million appropriation, so the difference is disclosed rather than filled with an invented category.

$34.0M
Department spending
Law Enforcement Operations22.6%
Other General Government14.7%
Fire Services14.4%
Recreation, Pool & Programs6.5%
Road & Street Facilities6.5%
Information Technology5.6%
Parks & Community Building4.4%
Other departments25.3%
Law Enforcement Operations
$7.7M
22.6%
Other General Government
$5.0M
14.7%
Fire Services
$4.9M
14.4%
Recreation, Pool & Programs
$2.2M
6.5%
Road & Street Facilities
$2.2M
6.5%
Information Technology
$1.9M
5.6%
Parks & Community Building
$1.5M
4.4%
Finance
$1.2M
3.5%
Library / Simpson House / Historical Museum
$1.1M
3.2%
Building Maintenance
$816K
2.4%
Planning & Development
$782K
2.3%
Customer Service
$746K
2.2%
Human Resources
$658K
1.9%
Facility Care
$511K
1.5%
Leisure Services Administration
$445K
1.3%
City Manager
$332K
1.0%
Code Compliance
$296K
0.9%
Economic Development
$290K
0.9%
City Attorney
$285K
0.8%
City Clerk
$259K
0.8%
Law Enforcement Communication
$250K
0.7%
Warehouse
$237K
0.7%
Urban Forestry
$196K
0.6%
Public Relations
$129K
0.4%
Legislative
$101K
0.3%
Meet your city government

What residents receive from the budget

Residents do not experience a budget as accounting lines. They experience it as services: public safety, parks, maintenance, infrastructure, technology, planning, and city operations.

🚓

Law Enforcement Operations

$7.7M22.7% of department spending

City services and operating functions supported through the General Fund.

🏛️

Other General Government

$5.0M14.7% of department spending

City management, finance, legal, human resources, purchasing, records, and citywide support.

🔥

Fire Services

$4.9M14.4% of department spending

Fire suppression, emergency medical response, prevention, and related public-safety operations.

🌳

Recreation, Pool & Programs

$2.2M6.6% of department spending

Parks, recreation, community programs, public spaces, events, and quality-of-life services.

🚧

Road & Street Facilities

$2.2M6.3% of department spending

Facilities, fleet, maintenance support, infrastructure upkeep, and operational support services.

💻

Information Technology

$1.9M5.6% of department spending

Technology systems, communications, cybersecurity, and digital service support.

🌳

Parks & Community Building

$1.5M4.3% of department spending

Parks, recreation, community programs, public spaces, events, and quality-of-life services.

🏛️

Finance

$1.2M3.5% of department spending

City management, finance, legal, human resources, purchasing, records, and citywide support.

📚

Library / Simpson House / Historical Museum

$1.1M3.3% of department spending

City services and operating functions supported through the General Fund.

📋

Building Maintenance

$816K2.4% of department spending

Planning, development review, permitting, inspections, zoning, and community growth management.

📋

Planning & Development

$782K2.3% of department spending

Planning, development review, permitting, inspections, zoning, and community growth management.

🏛️

Customer Service

$746K2.2% of department spending

City services and operating functions supported through the General Fund.

🏛️

Human Resources

$658K1.9% of department spending

City services and operating functions supported through the General Fund.

🏛️

Facility Care

$511K1.5% of department spending

City services and operating functions supported through the General Fund.

🌳

Leisure Services Administration

$445K1.3% of department spending

Parks, recreation, community programs, public spaces, events, and quality-of-life services.

🏛️

City Manager

$332K1.0% of department spending

City management, finance, legal, human resources, purchasing, records, and citywide support.

🏛️

Code Compliance

$296K0.9% of department spending

Planning, development review, permitting, inspections, zoning, and community growth management.

📋

Economic Development

$290K0.9% of department spending

Planning, development review, permitting, inspections, zoning, and community growth management.

🏛️

City Attorney

$285K0.8% of department spending

City services and operating functions supported through the General Fund.

🏛️

City Clerk

$259K0.8% of department spending

City management, finance, legal, human resources, purchasing, records, and citywide support.

🚓

Law Enforcement Communication

$250K0.7% of department spending

City services and operating functions supported through the General Fund.

🏛️

Warehouse

$237K0.7% of department spending

City services and operating functions supported through the General Fund.

🏛️

Urban Forestry

$196K0.6% of department spending

City services and operating functions supported through the General Fund.

🏛️

Public Relations

$129K0.4% of department spending

City services and operating functions supported through the General Fund.

🏛️

Legislative

$101K0.3% of department spending

City services and operating functions supported through the General Fund.

How public safety is actually funded

Mount Dora operates both services directly

The FY2026 budget shows approximately $7.7 million for Law Enforcement Operations and an exact $4,912,991 for Fire Services in the General Fund.

🚓

Mount Dora Police

About $7.7M

Law-enforcement operations, patrol, response, investigations and related staffing.

🔥

Mount Dora Fire Department

$4.91M

City-operated fire suppression and emergency response shown in the General Fund.

🔥

Fire Assessment Fee Fund

$8.87M

The adopted budget also reports a separate $8,868,259 Fire Assessment Fee fund.

Simple view

If the city's main budget were $100, where would it go?

Property taxes are pooled with other General Fund revenues. This comparison uses spending shares to show relative scale; it is not a legal earmark of each property-tax dollar.

Approximate service shares

🚓Law Enforcement
$23
🏛️Other General Government
$15
🔥Fire Services
$14
🌳Recreation
$7
🚧Roads
$6
💻Information Technology
$6
🏛️Other functions
$29
Where the money comes from

General Fund revenue sources

The detailed revenue lines reconcile exactly to the reported $34,082,515 operating General Fund total.

$34.1M
Total revenue
Ad Valorem / Property Tax38.1%
Charges for Services16.6%
ROI11.5%
Intergovernmental11.2%
Taxes8.9%
Transfers In4.5%
Franchise Fees3.3%
PILOT3.2%
Licenses & Permits1.4%
Miscellaneous0.9%
Fines & Forfeitures0.4%
Ad Valorem / Property Tax$12,980,258
38.1%
Charges for Services$5,662,834
16.6%
ROI$3,906,000
11.5%
Intergovernmental$3,834,827
11.2%
Taxes$3,034,298
8.9%
Transfers In$1,521,713
4.5%
Franchise Fees$1,138,651
3.3%
PILOT$1,085,100
3.2%
Licenses & Permits$495,800
1.4%
Miscellaneous$294,420
0.9%
Fines & Forfeitures$128,614
0.4%

Plain-English takeaway

The adopted budget shows $12,980,258 from Ad Valorem / Property Tax, the largest revenue source shown.

Ad Valorem / Property Tax
38.1%
of the revenue base shown
Other sources
61.9%
of the revenue base shown
These are adopted-budget revenue categories. They are not a homestead-only estimate.
Residential property value distribution

Where Mount Dora's residential properties fall by assessed value

This section groups mapped residential parcels into assessed-value ranges reported in the supplied property data. Assessed value is the value used as the starting point for taxable value after Florida assessment limits and exemptions. The ranges help residents see how many properties fall at or below, and above, the $250,000 threshold being discussed.

Residential parcels
6,899
All residential parcels in the assessed-value tier file.
Homesteaded parcels
4,282
Separate Florida League of Cities homestead-only count.
At or below $250,000
55.9%
3,858 residential parcels by assessed value.
Above $250,000
44.1%
3,041 residential parcels by assessed value.
Median assessed value
$241,135
Published homestead median, non-school taxes.

How Residential Properties Are Distributed by Assessed Value

Each bar shows the share of residential parcels in that assessed-value range. The percentages use the 6,899-parcel assessed-value total as the denominator.

$0–$100,000751 residential parcels
10.9%
$100,000–$150,000982 residential parcels
14.2%
$150,000–$200,0001,121 residential parcels
16.2%
$200,000–$250,0001,004 residential parcels
14.6%
$250,000–$300,000909 residential parcels
13.2%
$300,000–$400,0001,299 residential parcels
18.8%
$400,000–$500,000469 residential parcels
6.8%
$500,000–$750,000259 residential parcels
3.8%
$750,000–$1,000,00060 residential parcels
0.9%
$1,000,000+45 residential parcels
0.7%
55.9%
44.1%
■ At or below $250,000 assessed value■ Above $250,000 assessed value
About this parcel data: The tier chart uses a GIS-derived, city-associated residential parcel extract. It includes both homesteaded and non-homesteaded properties and may rely on situs or mailing-address assignments rather than a certified municipal boundary. Parcel coding, split parcels, address differences, and boundary matching can cause the totals to differ from official incorporated-area or homestead-only counts. Treat the distribution as a close educational estimate, not a certified municipal tax roll.
Before any reform — current law

How much home value is already untaxed here?

The Florida League of Cities analysis reports averages for Mount Dora homestead parcels. These figures describe current exemptions and Save Our Homes effects, not a city revenue-loss projection. Unlike the assessed-value distribution above, these figures describe homesteaded parcels and the protection provided by Save Our Homes and existing homestead exemptions.

What the Florida League of Cities Homestead Data Shows

Median assessed value
$241,135
Median among analyzed homestead parcels.
Average SOH differential
$116,653
Average value protected through Save Our Homes.
SOH + exemption
$166,336
Average combined value not subject to tax.
Average not taxed
50.29%
Average share protected by SOH and homestead exemption combined.

Plain-English takeaway

The published homestead data for Mount Dora shows that current law already shields a meaningful portion of qualifying home value through Save Our Homes and homestead exemptions. The reported combined protected share is 50.29%.

This describes current law already in effect. It is not a projected city revenue loss.

Myth vs. fact, using this city's own data

The claim

Only a small share of homestead value is already protected under current law.

Mount Dora's own data

The published city-level homestead figures above show the measured effect of Save Our Homes and existing exemptions before any proposed reform.

Residential property values

How Many Residential Properties Have an Assessed Value Above or Below $250,000?

Understanding the difference between market value and assessed value is important when discussing Florida property taxes. Market value represents the estimated selling price of a property under current market conditions. Assessed value is determined by the County Property Appraiser using Florida law and is the basis for calculating taxable value after assessment limitations, such as Save Our Homes, and applicable exemptions are applied.

Why assessed value matters

Proposed homestead-exemption changes would affect the assessed or taxable value of qualifying homesteaded properties, not the property's market value. Assessed value therefore provides the more useful measure for showing how many residential properties fall above or below the $250,000 threshold.

Educational note: A property's market value may be significantly higher than its assessed value because Florida law limits annual assessment increases for many qualifying homesteaded properties through the Save Our Homes assessment limitation.

Where Mount Dora's homes fall relative to $250,000

Picture 4 typical homes in this city. Roughly this many already sit at or under a $250,000 assessed value:

🏠
🏠
🏠
🏠
About 2 out of every 4 homes
55.9%
44.1%
■ At or below $250,000 assessed value■ Above $250,000 assessed value
3,858
of 6,899 mapped residential parcels citywide (55.9%) have an assessed value at or below $250,000.

Narrowing to homesteaded homes specifically

The 55.9% figure above covers every mapped residential parcel citywide, homesteaded or not. An exact homestead-only breakdown by assessed-value tier is not available in the source data used for this page, so no exact qualifying-home count is presented.

What this means — and doesn't mean — for the city budget

A large share of parcels falling below the threshold does not translate dollar-for-dollar into the same share of city property-tax revenue disappearing. Revenue effects depend on taxable value, exemption eligibility, final legal language, phase-in rules, and replacement funding—not parcel count alone. Current-law protections already shield about 50.3% of the typical homesteaded property value shown in the separate homestead dataset.

What this is — and isn't: This shows where Mount Dora's mapped residential parcels sit relative to the $250,000 assessed-value threshold. It is not a city revenue-loss projection.
Bigger picture

Property tax is not the whole City budget

Property taxes are a major General Fund revenue source, but they are not the only source supporting Mount Dora's day-to-day services. Other taxes, state-shared revenue, fees, charges, transfers, and other legally available resources also contribute.

How the published General Fund pieces fit together

General Fund spending $35,997,048Adopted General Fund appropriations or spending plan reported on this page.
General Fund operating revenue $34,082,515Published operating revenue used for the General Fund comparison on this page.
Property-tax revenue $12,980,25838.08% of the published General Fund revenue base used on this page.
Scope note: The source material currently included with this page does not provide a verified, directly comparable all-funds total. This section therefore uses the published General Fund figures rather than estimating a citywide total.

What property taxes generally do and do not fund

Generally General Fund

  • Police and other public-safety operations funded by the City
  • Administration, finance, legal, and citywide support
  • Parks, planning, public works, and community services
  • Technology, facilities, and recurring municipal operations

Often separate or restricted

  • Water, sewer, sanitation, and other utility operations
  • Stormwater, grants, capital projects, and debt funds
  • Impact fees and other legally restricted revenue
  • County, district, or outside-agency services not funded by the City's General Fund
Budget change

Did the budget grow from last year?

A responsible year-over-year comparison must use the same fund definition and the same adopted-budget basis in both years. The figures already verified on this page establish the FY2026 operating picture, but they do not always provide a comparable citywide FY2025 total.

FY2026 GF spending
$35,997,048
Adopted General Fund spending or appropriations.
FY2026 GF revenue
$34,082,515
Published General Fund operating revenue.
Property-tax revenue
$12,980,258
38.08% of the revenue base used here.
Year-over-year finding: The current page sources do not provide a comparable all-funds FY2025-to-FY2026 table. A year-over-year citywide percentage is therefore not stated.
Current-year context: Appropriations exceed recurring operating revenue; the budget material describes carryforward items, encumbrances, and approved project funding.
Citizen question

Why not just cut spending?

Spending can be reduced, but the practical question is which services, positions, contracts, projects, or maintenance cycles would change. This page does not label spending as necessary or wasteful without a separate operational or performance review.

Options cities commonly evaluate when recurring revenue changes

Delay capital projectsCan reduce near-term spending, but may increase future repair or replacement costs.
Hold positions vacantMay lower personnel costs while also reducing service capacity or increasing workloads.
Review contractsSavings depend on contract terms, service requirements, market prices, and renewal dates.
Adjust feesCan shift some costs toward service users but may not legally or practically replace broad operating revenue.
Use reservesMay address a temporary gap, but reserves are not a permanent replacement for recurring revenue.
Reduce service levelsCould affect response capacity, maintenance, parks, programs, facilities, or customer service.
Neutral answer: The adopted budget shows what the City plans to spend. Determining what could be reduced safely requires a separate review of staffing, contracts, legal obligations, service standards, asset condition, and community priorities.
Five things to know

The citizen summary

1
Two General Fund totals$34.08M in operating revenue and $36.00M in adopted appropriations.
2
Property taxes are largestThey provide 38.08% of operating General Fund revenue.
3
Public safety is centralLaw enforcement and fire are major city-operated functions.
4
Fire has two funding views$4.91M in the General Fund plus a separate $8.87M fire-assessment fund.
5
Final impact is unknownA current revenue line is not automatically a future loss estimate.
FAQ

Short answers to common citizen questions

Why are General Fund revenue and appropriations different?

The budget source reports $34,082,515 in operating General Fund revenue and $35,997,048 in adopted appropriations. It explains that the larger adopted amount includes final changes, encumbrances, carryforward items and approved project funding.

How is fire service handled?

Mount Dora operates its own Fire Department. The source shows $4,912,991 for Fire Services in the General Fund and $8,868,259 in a separate Fire Assessment Fee fund.

Why do rounded department amounts not total exactly?

The source page lists rounded amounts and percentages. The displayed amounts total about $34.03 million, so this page does not invent a balancing category for the difference.

Are all 6,899 residential parcels homesteaded?

No. The tier file covers a broader residential parcel population. The separate FLC analysis reports 4,282 homestead parcels.

Does $12.98 million equal a guaranteed future loss?

No. It is the current ad valorem General Fund revenue line. A future impact depends on the final policy design and replacement funding.

Full transparency

Where every number on this page comes from

Primary sources

  • City of Mount Dora FY2025–26 Adopted Budget Book
  • Florida League of Cities city-by-city homestead exemption analysis.
  • Mount Dora residential parcel-tier dataset supplied for this project.
  • Florida city-by-city taxable-value and $250,000-threshold datasets used for context and cross-checking.
Quality control: The 11 revenue lines sum exactly to $34,082,515. Both parcel-tier columns total 6,899. The department figures are labeled rounded and are not forced to reconcile to the exact appropriation.